Template Chooser
|
|
Saturday, 19 January 2008 |
|
The Conservative Argument: Why do Democrats rail against nuclear power? They constantly demand that we move to "energy independence", but they always reject any means by which that could actually happen. They argue for solar power, wind power, soybean power, but all of those are supplementary forms of energy. They cannot be primary sources of energy. They are intermittent.
Not to mention that when windmills were erected off of Cape Cod, the grand liberal himself, Teddy Bear Kennedy fought strenuously to have them removed. He didn't want alternative forms of power in his backyard. He thought they were unsightly and not becoming a community as posh posh as Cape Cod! So we have liberals fighting against any form of energy that could actually work, or that would be put in their own backyard. Nuclear energy is the one form of energy that could solve just about every problem Democrats have with energy. It's not imported. It's incredibly safe. It's incredibly clean (i.e. it doesn't contribute to "global warming"). Yet they rail against it. The Liberal Argument: The science is just not there concerning nuclear power. It's far too dangerous a risk at this time. Nuclear waste lasts hundreds of thousands of years and there's no reliable way to get rid of the billions of tons of it that would be produced. The Conservative Rebuttal: Fortunately, a new book by Gwenyth Cravens debunks ALL of these myths. Not surprising to learn that liberals would argue with their backs to the facts! |
|
Read more...
|
|
Saturday, 19 January 2008 |
|
The Conservative Argument: Political correctness has hamstrung America's efforts in the war against Islamic jihad. From the battlefield in Iraq back to the Pentagon in Washington, politically correct bullies have intimidated officials into hurting America. The Liberal Argument: There is no evidence political correctness has harmed our efforts. It's bungling on the part of the Bush administration that has done the damage.
Conservative Response: If anything, what the Bush administration has bungled is that it has gone along far too often with what the politically correct left has wanted. Then when it fails, the left can conveniently blame Bush. What they don't realize is that what has failed has been when the Bush administration has listened too much to the Left. The Evidence: This editorial in Investors Business Daily documents a case where political correctness caused the man who knew more than anyone about the connection between Islam and terror - and wasn't afraid to speak out about it, to be fired. |
|
Read more...
|
|
Sunday, 13 January 2008 |
|
The following poll reported over at HughHewitt.com has some interesting things going on:
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Friday, 11 January 2008 |
Woman at center of Indiana voter ID law case was registered to vote in two states!
Democrats are the first to scream "voter fraud" every time they lose an election. Yet, they continue to refuse to take the single most sensible and effective step to combat voter fraud - that of requiring photo ID at polling stations. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Thursday, 10 January 2008 |
U.N. Agency Lowers AIDS Estimates
GENEVA, Switzerland, Nov. 20, 2007 (UPI) -- The United Nations lowered its estimates of the number of AIDS-infected people worldwide, indicating that the disease's growth has slowed for the first time.
Better sampling techniques indicate the number of new infections peaked in 1998 and the number of deaths peaked in 2005, the Los Angeles Times reported Tuesday.
The new analysis indicated the total number of people living with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, has been increasing gradually, but at a slower rate than previously reported. An estimated 2.5 million people will be infected with HIV this year, about a 40 percent drop from a 2006 estimate, the Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS, or UNAIDS, reported from its headquarters in Switzerland.
The report said about 33 million people worldwide are infected with the virus, compared with last year's estimate of almost 40 million.
"For the first time, we are seeing a decline in global AIDS deaths," said Dr. Kevin De Cock, director of the AIDS department at the World Health Organization.
----------------------------------- |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Tuesday, 08 January 2008 |
|
Rational Argument: Since Hurricane Katrina hit
the Gulf Coast of the US in August 2005, there have been many predictions that
more hurricanes just like it were on the way in future years and that they will
be caused by global warming. It was also claimed often that Katrina was
the result of global warming.
Liberal Argument circa 2008:
No one ever said Hurricane Katrina was caused by global warming.
Yes they did and here's
one article
that shows it.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Wednesday, 02 January 2008 |
|
In a video interview with the Wall Street Journal in an article published January 2, 2008, Shirley MacLaine explains that "aliens" do not like to be called "aliens". They prefer to be called "star beings" because as she explains they are our cosmic brothers and sisters! It's interesting isn't it that space aliens (oops! sorry - star beings) have the same politically-correct sensibilities as liberals? We always knew their heads were in the clouds!
|
|
|
Sunday, 06 January 2008 |
|
A Russian scientist is
concurring with an American scientist who said recently that global warming has
peaked (the American said it peaked in 2000) and we are now entering a cooling
period which the Russian says will begin in earnest in 2012. He says chillin'
global temperatures will bottom out around the middle of the century, but take
the the entire last half of the century to warm back up. He bases his
predictions on solar activity.
Also, British scientists say that 2007 was the
coldest year since 2000 because of a drop in sea surface temperatures off the
western coast of South America due to La Niña. Although it still ranks in the
top 10 warmest years. But it does point to a cooling trend that is thought
to have begun around the year 2000.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Sunday, 06 January 2008 |
|
In a Republican presidential debate in New Hampshire on January 5, 2008, Mike Huckabee said that he supported
President Bush's troop surge in Iraq when it was announced in January of 2007.
However, here's what Mike Huckabee actually said in January 2007 about the troop
surge:
"Well, I'm not sure that I
support the troop surge, if that surge has to come from our Guard and Reserve
troops, which have already been overly stretched." This was said on
MSNBC on January 24, 2007. |
|
|
Sunday, 06 January 2008 |
|
Global Warming:
The Argument: Humans are grossly negligent to the environment with all the CO2 emissions we pump into the atmosphere which everyone knows is making the
climate alarmingly warm.
The Rational Response: It’s getting cooler not
hotter! In a 12/19/2007 editorial in the Washington Post, David Deming, a
geophysicist, an adjunct scholar with the National Center for Policy Analysis,
at the University of Oklahoma wrote that not only is the climate cooling down,
that cooling is deadly.
Just the facts from
his editorial:
-
...Record low temperatures are
being set all over the world.
In 2007, hundreds of people died, not from global warming, but from
cold weather hazards.
-
Since the mid-19th
century, the mean global temperature has increased by 0.7 degrees Celsius. This
slight warming is not unusual, and lies well within the range of natural
variation. Carbon dioxide continues to build in the atmosphere, but the mean
planetary temperature hasn't increased significantly for nearly nine years.
-
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Monday, 31 December 2007 |
|
The Rational Response: The main problem with Al Gore's global warming agenda is that he calls for us to make extreme sacrifices. He calls for a 90% REDUCTION in carbon emissions within the next 10-15 years! That's crazy. That would only mean death for millions as we'd have to simply quit using a huge amount of energy as technology and conservation will not be enough to come even close to helping us make a 90% reduction. Their Argument: He's not calling for anyting that extreme. The Facts: Yes, he is. And here's the proof. An editorial written by Al Gore himself and published in the New York Times July 1, 2007. Here's the full text of the editorial. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Tuesday, 30 November 1999 |
|
I was just having a conversation with a Democrat who swore up and down that Republicans are racist. Conveniently, the Wall Street Journal published this editorial the same day. Racist statements made by prominent Democrats. Their list goes back to the 1800s, but I'll include here what I think is the more recent and relevant part. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|